Tagged: minimal Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • mono 6:58 am on September 25, 2008 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , css, , , minimal, , suggestions, the eyeslitcrypt   



    We’ve been guzzling gallons of coffee, while working to re-design the identity of The Eyeslit-Crypt. I think we’ve settled on a nice look, a warm and inviting space for you to sink into and hopefully find something of relevance and/or interest. Nonetheless, we are restless, thus we apologize if this site looks a little different the next time you come here.

    We are pawns to CSS stylesheets, mere debutantes. That is to say, we stir the waters and watch the emerging patterns. We burn our eyes out trying to craft an intuitive and simple design. Have you any suggestions or recommendations?


    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • mono 7:31 am on September 6, 2008 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Amarok, audacious, bmpx, , Macintosh, minimal, music players, Open source, , , Ubuntu, Ubuntu Linux, Windows   


    A music player should serve to enhance the pleasure of how you perceive, collect, and connect with your music collection. When I used to use Macintosh computers, I exclusively used iTunes as it came directly installed with my iBook. I appreciated the ease of use, while not caring at all about the design of the interface. It was easy to use and neatly organized. That made me happy. Several years later (and several broken Macintosh computers later), I sensed a lack in the iTunes environment; a sterility and heartlessness. Looking for alternatives, I came across Songbird, which I still use on one Windows computer. The add-on features of Songbird were appealing to me. Giddy was the day when I found I could listen to music, write blog posts and watch Youtube videos all at the same time from within Songbird. However, that thrill faded as I began to yearn for a music player that was simply a music player and nothing more. I wanted simplicity. I wanted an application that would help pull my attention to the music, provide a beautiful and clean environment for listening and be neatly organized.

    Jumping forward to 2007, I began running Ubuntu Linux and was impressed with the wide variety of music players available, all open-source and all varied in design and functionality. The Ubuntu Linux music players that I have used include the following:

    1. Amarok
    2. Audacious
    3. Banshee
    4. BMPX
    5. Banshee
    6. Exaile
    7. Juk
    8. Kaffeine
    9. Rhythmbox

    Of the above-listed nine players, and writing this now in 2008, only two have thoroughly impressed me and gave me that warm fuzzy feeling that has a tendency to get lost in listening to a music “file.” The first one, which I appreciate is “Audacious.” Audacious, with its simple light interface provides all I need to allow the music to come forth from the player, to lose the player. It doesn’t bog me down and it creates a nice atmosphere from which to simply listen. The second, apparently made by the same folks (correct me if I’m wrong) is BMPX. With BMPX, it seems that strict attention was paid to both the form and function of the player; the player comes alive. The typeface that the designers chose is sleek and clear, while the design is easy to manage and appealing. Everything seems to fit just right. Also, it makes adding your LastFM account a breeze and allows an easily accessible internet radio browsing function. Through applications like Audacious and BMPX, one is able to regain the sense of magic that comes with listening to music. Granted, listening to music files is definitely not the same experience as listening to a nice piece of vinyl or a cassette tape, but these programs provide a nice alternative for those of us who have amassed a large collection of music files and seek out a worth player, a player that will satisfy us.

    Of course, my tastes and your tastes differ. I hope you find the best music player for your listening pleasure. Thank you for reading.


    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
    • Justin 10:16 am on September 6, 2008 Permalink

      I’ve actually never tried either one of those. Will have to check them out. I’ve used AmaroK and it was nice but bloated. That tends to be a problem with music players these days; super stripped-down or overly-ambitious…

    • jgrefe 6:05 pm on September 8, 2008 Permalink

      Thank you, Justin. “Bloated” is a good word for Amarok. I really wanted to like it, but it just wasn’t feeling right for me. Please keep in touch and let me know if you find any other good players.

    • Rob Buse 12:55 am on September 23, 2008 Permalink

      What software are you using to produce music on linux?

Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc