Tagged: Zach Galifianakis Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • mono 7:42 am on October 18, 2008 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: austin, dates, , jared drake, , , november, october, san francisco, screening, visioneers, Zach Galifianakis   

    Zach Galifianakis’s “Visioneers” Screening Dates (October/November) 

    If you are near Austin, Los Angeles or San Francisco, you may be interested in checking out director Jared Drake’s film, “Visioneers” starring Zach Galifianakis. If you have already seen this film, would like to hear your thoughts. I admire the work of Galifianakis and this film looks promising.

    The synopsis, from the Visioneers website is as follows: “George Washington Winsterhammerman lives an ordinary life. He has a wife, a kid, a house, and a boat. Every day George gets in his minivan and goes to work as a Level Three Tunt at the Jeffers Corporation, the largest and most profitable corporation in the history of mankind. It is an utterly comfortable life, but when people around George begin exploding, he fears he might be next. George visits his doctor and learns that the dreams he’s been having are a symptom of impending explosion. Unfortunately, George can’t stop dreaming, and as the explosion epidemic worsens, he is forced to question the life he’s been living.

    October 17th
    San Francisco
    Anti Corporate Film Festival

    October 18th
    Austin, Texas
    Austin Film Festival

    November 1st and 3rd
    Los Angeles
    AFI Fest

  • mono 12:01 pm on April 2, 2008 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Absolut Vodka, Absolut Zach, , , , Liquor and Wine, Publicity Image, Tim and Eric, Zach Galifianakis   

    The Publicity Image: Zach Galifianakis and Absolut 

    Zach Galifianakis

    Zach Galifianakis recently made a commercial for Absolut Vodka (featuring the comedic duo “Tim and Eric“). Apparently, Galifianakis was given complete control in the making of this commercial. How are we supposed to react to this video? What is this publicity image saying to us? What creeps in below the radar and why is this such an uncomfortably funny video?

    In his book “Ways of Seeing,” John Berger analyzes ‘the publicity image’ in contemporary culture and through the lens of oil paintings. Today, I will try to see the Zach Galifianakis Absolut ad in a different way, paying special attention to it and try to flesh it out a little bit.

    First, the visual aesthetic of the commercial is important as this is a highly stylized piece. That is, the first thing we notice is that we are somehow not in the ‘real’ world. What I mean is that, it seems that the commercial takes place in some kind of margin of reality, a zone located somewhere between our common everyday experience and an obscene dream-space where anything can happen. Perhaps, the semblance of reality is just that, a semblance, perhaps we have truly entered into Galifianakis’s fantasy space: the strange wigs blurring the genders of the characters, the white robes, symbolizing purity, comfort and affluence or the modern suburban sterility of the room and talk of the hot-tub seem to transport us to a kind of “soap-opera” realm of intrigue.

    And, what role does Absolut play in all of this? Well, it seems that Absolut is portrayed as being an elixir from the Gods, a substance both sublime and terrifying. I like how Galifianakis and crew savor the vodka, smelling its aroma, stirring it, sipping it and fully embracing it as a holy fetishistic object. The whole idea of “Absolut on ice,” simply being enjoyed by itself is unsettling. Moreover, despite the bizarre nature of their conversations, when the Absolut begins flowing, everything is momentarily restored to a deceptive serenity (until Zach’s agressivity is unleashed). What this is saying is twofold, perhaps threefold: First, there is Asolut as decadent fetish object (the smelling, excessive savoring), then there is Absolut as monster (Galifianakis snapping violently about the temperature of the hot tub), third, Absolut as peace-bringer (if only you drink Absolut, harmony will temporarily be restored to your life…a terrifying serenity).

    Berger, in his book writes: “Publicity persuades us of such a transformation by showing us people who have apparently been transformed and are, as a result, enviable. The state of being envied is what constitutes glamour. And publicity is the process of manufacturing glamour (Berger 131).” The transformation that he speaks of is the way we will come to see ourself after buying the new product, after giving in to the publicity image. However, it is very difficult to read the Zach Galifianakis Absolut commercial in terms of envy. We can easily see the glamour image as represented in the decor of the room, the robes, the hairstyles and the music, but there is something absolutely evil underlying this publicity image, which is what I really admire about this commercial. That is, Galifiankis does give us a taste of the transformation, but the transformation is so disconnected from our everyday reality that it is terrifying and uncomfortable. Do we envy Galifiankis’s character? Does the spectator-viewer wish to transform his or her life into this kind of maddening phantasmatic nightmare? I would even go further and ask, are we supposed to think that these are human beings? Are they not portrayed as some kind of perverse angels (spirits) existing in a horrifying zone of fantasy?

    However, I think many of us when watching this can easily relate to it on some level. That is, although a bit unsettling and funny, when we hear the empty conversation, the, as Lacan may say “lure” of converation, we understand what is going on. For Lacan, the “lure” is the intentional deceptive conversational game that we play in our everyday life. It is talking about hot tubs when we really want to say something else. What is really being talked about in these empty conversations? In this commercial, I see an underlying aggressivity and unpredictability exuding from these characters: the outburst of anger, the excessive laughter, the opening conversation scene in all its deceptive banality…But, again, Absolut is seen as the elixir, the horrific and calming savior in this vague world of deception.

    I admire Galifianakis for making this “commercial,” and it is great to see him able to exercise his genius. Now, where is my absolut on ice?

    The Absolut Video by Zach Galifianakis can be seen here: ABSOLUT ZACH

    • trent 12:36 pm on June 17, 2009 Permalink

      what are you talking about? robes symbolizing purity? you just made that up

    • Clark 7:24 am on July 21, 2010 Permalink

      I like what you had to say about Zack and his co-conspirators in this series. After watching these commercials, I wrote this evaluation –

      Marketing Metadiscourse: An exploration of the marriage of comedy and advertising in referencing the marketing process.

      What impressions of the product and or company are made when the restrictions on creative expression in the design, direction, and theme of cult advertising projects are gone and left completely to the comedians? Is this a new directional trend for popular brands? When updated marketing strategies call for more risky ideas and execution, AND thanks to TiVo and DVR, broadcast television and even cable or satellite advertising may be an afterthought when compared to new social media like Youtube and others. Funny or Die, a comedy-themed video networking site co-created by comedy legend Will Ferrell, has a total viewership of many many millions, and is a place for biting critiques, sketches and parodies that are often “too-much-for-TV” and viral in nature.
      Hidden among these short vignettes is a series of actual advertisements which are sponsored by a brave new marketing team at Absolut, a long-time leader in the fine vodka market. While endearing and humorous at times, the 2-3 minute commercials seem to fall apart in leadership and the viewer is shown the seriousness of the advertising agenda that directors must come to terms with, despite what their most comedic and playful intentions belie.

      But is that their goal? Are we, the audience so malleable and naïve to believe that these comedians didn’t simply write the gaffes and fighting and lack of direction into the script? Does letting the boom mics show and the wigs come off provide a mirror to the intentions of all purveyors of promotional tools? Or is that ALSO a promotional tool? By not falling in line with straight-forward commercial direction, they profess to be distanced from the company and indeed the “uncool” nature of marketers who have infiltrated the realm of “comedy for its own sake” for their PROFITS sake.

      Funny is funny only if left unviolated, because it IS sacred and people know that, so they might as well point it out as obtusely as possible, poke fun at the process. We know they’re trying to sell vodka, and consumers will buy it anyway, but dammit, why shouldn’t they be allowed to make us laugh at the WAY that normal companies promote their image? Alignment with comedy professionals is not so terrible. They know what they’re doing. The results are hilarious…. It reminds you that its OK to “let your boom mics show”. We know they’re there and it’s refreshing to see behind the scenes of production sometimes. We’re all promoting ourselves whether we realize it or not and we like the implication that something is fake when it so obviously is, especially in this case. To that end, I say “Awesome commercial, great job!”

Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc